Library Comparison¶
This page compares signified with two other Python reactive libraries: reaktiv and param. All three implement reactive programming, but they differ in API design, feature scope, and performance.
Features At a Glance¶
| signified | reaktiv | param | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Read a value | x.value |
x() |
x.rx.value |
| Write a value | x.value = v |
x.set(v) |
x.rx.value = v |
| Derived value (inline) | y = x * 2 |
— | y = x.rx() * 2 |
| Derived value (decorator) | @computed |
@Computed |
@param.depends |
| React to changes | Effect(fn) |
Effect(fn) |
x.rx.watch(fn) / obj.param.watch(fn, ...) |
| Operator overloading | Yes | No | Yes (via obj.rx()) |
| Async support | No | Yes | Yes |
| Multithreading support | No | Yes | No |
API Comparison¶
Here is the same computation expressed in each library:
Key usability differences¶
signified overloads Python operators so reactive expressions can typically read like normal code (price * quantity returns a reactive Computed object). The .rx namespace handles some additional operations Python cannot easily overload, such as equality/identity testing.
reaktiv requires explicit Computed(lambda: ...) wrappers but, like signified, automatically tracks dependencies — every signal read inside the lambda is tracked.
param supports two reactive styles. The rx interface (shown above) allows standalone reactive values with operator overloading, similar to signified. The Parameterized class-based style provides rich metadata: type checking, bounds, documentation, and introspection. It integrates deeply with the HoloViz ecosystem (Panel, HoloViews).
Performance¶
Benchmarks were run with signified-bench at commit 36e10c9edab4202dd30b5c2950b8cb6f29215eda using pytest-benchmark.
The versions compared here were signified==0.4.0, reaktiv==0.21.3, and param==2.3.3, run on a MacBook M1 Max.
These numbers are meant to give a broad sense of performance rather than serve as a fully rigorous benchmark suite.
Results show median wall-clock time per scenario (lower is better).
signified 0.4.0 vs reaktiv vs param¶
With 0.4.0, signified and reaktiv are closely matched in terms of single threaded performance. The amount of overhead either library would introduce is small compared to whatever work would typically be done within non-toy computed functions.
param is significantly slower.
| Scenario | signified 0.4.0 | reaktiv | param |
|---|---|---|---|
signal_read_write |
8 ms | 7 ms | 204 ms |
multi_input_computed |
26 ms | 36 ms | 421 ms |
shared_dependency_branches |
26ms | 28 ms | 613 ms |
shared_clock_reads |
47 ms | 49 ms | 1240 ms |
deep_chain_updates |
120 ms | 134 ms | 1576 ms |
fanout_updates |
206 ms | 236 ms | 3593 ms |
diamond_updates |
224 ms | 257 ms | 3933 ms |
effect_fanout_updates |
494 ms | 1501 ms | 3156 ms |
signified 0.4.0 is a substantial performance release. Across all scenarios it runs roughly 2.5–3× faster than 0.3.2.
Choosing a library¶
Choose signified if you want Pythonic syntax, operator overloading, and competitive performance. However, signified does not support async and is not threadsafe.
Choose reaktiv if you prefer an explicit, Angular-inspired API where every dependency is a function call, or if you need built-in async resource loading.
Choose param if you are building UI components in the HoloViz ecosystem (Panel, HoloViews).
Other libraries that are not comparable to signified¶
ReactiveX (rxpy) works with processing asynchronous streams of data with operators. It is an inherently different computation model at its core, even if it looks similar at first glance.